We can all easily agree that the need for health care is universal. Sometimes you need medicine, a doctor’s visit, even surgery. We are all similar in that we all require our basic physical and mental health needs to be met in order to live a good quality of life.
Some other things that we can agree on about health care: 1) the issue of health care is divisive and 2) our nation’s system is flawed.
How about some facts? The Census Bureau reported today that in 2011 48.6 million people, 15.7% of the United States’ population, had no form of health insurance.
When compared to 12 other industrialized countries (e.g. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan), researchers show that the U.S. pays the most for health care- nearly $8,000 per person in 2009.
Increased spending does not necessarily equal increased health care effectiveness or quality of care. While the U.S. boasts high colorectal and breast cancer survival rates, we also have a higher than average number of preventable asthma-related deaths and diabetes-related amputations.
Once we are aware of these facts, then, the question of health care reform surely changes from “Should we?” to “How and when do we?”
Now, you’re probably thinking, “What rock have you been living under? Heard of the Affordable Care Act?” And yes, I too cannot open Yahoo!News without reading about President Obama’s brainchild. And yes, the coming series of entries on this blog will be focused primarily on what many refer to as Obamacare. Yet, before we dive into the specific policy, it is prudent to set the general stage.
We’ve talked health care problems; now let’s talk solutions. Three different teams of researchers suggest different approaches that they believe should be incorporated in our nation’s search for a health care solution.
1) Pay for Quality of Care, Not Quantity. In this approach, health care providers would be awarded bonuses for things like preventative care (immunizations and cancer screenings), patient satisfaction (Is my doctor listening to me or rushing me out the door?), and investments in technology (helping to reduce medical errors) rather than receiving payment based on the number of patients seen. A 2006 Harvard University study encourages this line of patient-centric thinking, while cautioning that the empirical evidence backing this idea is still limited.
2) End Overtreatment. Overtreatment includes patients receiving prescriptions for unneeded medications, the ordering of unnecessary medical testing (e.g. MRI’s), precautionary hospitalizations, and surgery before exploring other options. Researchers Berwick and Hackbarth estimate that overtreatment accounted for anywhere between $158 billion and $226 billion in health care costs in 2011. If the use of treatments and medicines that hold little to no benefit to patients are discovered and reduced, the savings in health care costs could be immense.
3) Look to Other Countries for Ideas. As we’ve mentioned, the United States’ health care costs are incredibly higher than that of 12 other industrialized nations. All of the countries (except the United States) examined in the study conducted by the Commonwealth Fund provide universal health care to their citizens. Of the 12 industrialized nations, Japan spends the least on health care (7% of their GDP in 2009, compared to 17% of the GDP in the U.S.). It seems our neighbors are doing something right.
The problems with our nation’s health care system can seem overwhelming or unfixable when thought of too hard or long. Yet, it is important to remember that with a big problem comes a big possibility for reform. The opportunities before our nation to change health care for the better are great and the nation is certainly capable. You and I have even begun the first step of the process by becoming part of the discussion.
Let’s continue the discussion below. What’s your take on the general system of health care in the United States? I’d love to hear your opinions!
References
Berwick, D. & Hackbarth, A. (2012). Eliminating waste in U.S. health care. JAMA, 307 (14). Retrieved from https://sremote.pitt.edu/,DanaInfo=jama.jamanetwork.com+article.aspx?articleid=1148376
The Commonwealth Fund. (2012). U.S. spends far more for health care than 12 industrialized nations, but quality varies [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/News/News%20Releases/2012/Apr/SquiresOECDRelease_FINAL_5312wolink.pdf
Fox, E. (2012, Sept. 12). Fewer Americans uninsured- Census Bureau. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/12/news/economy/census-bureau-health-insurance/
Rosenthal, M. & Frank, R. (2006). What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Medical Care Research and Review, 63. Retrieved from http://mcr.sagepub.com/content/63/2/135.full.pdf+html